Create account

1836d · memo
Sad to see people leave Memo because we don't drop support of whichever coin they don't like :(
replied 1836d
I am a BCH supporter and I have NO intention of leaving. I have no problem people doing stuff for BSV. As long as you keep doing awesome stuff with Memo agnostically I am happy.
replied 1836d
I understand if money is an issue and Coingeek pays, but BCH is the more decentralized project, as is most of its fundraising

I'm here with my 1m sat tips for BCH developments though
Simon Van Gelder
replied 1836d
Keep the protocol open, and the market real. That's all you can do. Keep on keepin' on.
replied 1836d
You can't please everyone. In my opinion, Memo is doing a great job. Keep expanding the reach of the network. We will on-board more users.
replied 1836d
Memo is a powerful censorship resistant gift. Don't undervalue the platform.
replied 1836d
Memo is just a front end which can be shut down and censored. The blockchain is the "censorship resistant gift"
replied 1836d
I sure as hell am not leaving Memo. It's the only place that'll take me in the post liberal pro censorship takeover of Twitter and Reddit.
x2dm
replied 1836d
You're right, but... it's probably less about BSV vs. BCH per se and more about the use of the word 'roaches'... I can see why that might elicit some strong responses.
replied 1836d
I guess so
replied 1836d
That's not what happened.

You liked a comment which called BitcoinCash supporters "roaches". You should have apologized instead of lying and twisting reality.

#Unprofessional
replied 1836d
I respect Memo's neutrality. we're stronger together and the fighting is unattractive to new people.
replied 1836d
Liking a comment which calls the main users of the site "roaches" is anything but neutral.
replied 1835d
This account likes 100s of comments a week. I'm sorry one of them hurt your feelings. But your claim that we have any animosity toward BCH is obviously false, and borders on trolling.
replied 1835d
You must be stupid AF to double down on your idiocy instead of correcting your appalling behavior.
replied 1835d
Dude relax. He already explained himself. Remember this is an immutable ledger.
x2dm
replied 1835d
Liking a comment which calls ANYONE "roaches" is wrong. It doesn't matter who the main users of the site are. It's not about neutrality, it's about supporting proper discourse.
🤑 478559 🤑
replied 1808d
One of your very first users here @Memo. Thank you for supporting #BSV. Happy 1st Birthday! :)
replied 1808d
Time to confess your ties to the BSV SCAM COIN.
replied 1808d
Memo, WTF?! don't be a FUCKING RETARD.

That account didn't touch your platform for a fucking year.

Also, what's with this "Thank you for supporting BSV crap"???
replied 1836d
Don't worry. Pretty soon the shit version scam chain will die and then nobody will have to deal with it anymore.
replied 1836d
Shitcoins hardly ever die. Hell, you can still send and recieve Bitconnect probably.
replied 1836d
The question is if you really want to be a multi coin project.
replied 1836d
It wouldn't have been my first choice. Please see earlier conversations if you want more info.
replied 1836d
Like this post? https://memo.cash/post/cdf326ae4befe177b0176f1deed5ba3229cf7f47663945102733cadde531cbf1

Well, BCH (ABC side) clearly won the so-called "hashwar".
replied 1836d
Yep, and that's why memo.cash follows BCH. BSV got a sub-domain and eventually a separate domain, memo.sv.
BSVisBITCOIN
replied 1834d
Very Sad but I will help you find new support..... Idiots who leave based on politics. It is baked into Bitcoin.
replied 1836d
Seems to me that they're leaving because you're not giving enough support to the coin they like.
replied 1836d
This is just laughably false. The guy liked a tweet which called BitcoinCash supporters "roaches".

Instead of an apology he started lying about it.
replied 1836d
It's a bit foolish to make two competing projects share a platform, one of which is a scam, Coingeek "decentralized" blockchain, and not expect a backlash from either side