why are SV supporters always saying that BCH will be proof-of-stake, when noone in the community wants this and never talked about PoS at all? Jimmy is spreading propaganda there.
BCH is amaury's pet-project; in the end & when it matters it will go his way over what 'community' wishes
Besides that. You're just being dishonest. It is NOT just Amaury's pet project, but yea he puts a lot of work into it. That is how it goes. Some talk, some do.
just watch this; it is very clear that what amaury says - goes
It's very clear that what CSW says - goes
(This infight bitching around is pretty lame...)
Oh yea? And BSV is not at aaaaalll nChain's/CSWs pet-project and miner-project? LOL
BSV long-term road-map is very clear - Bitcoin V0.1
...if you can be more gung-ho at getting us there than nChain, then i'll stand behind you as well
It's like if Microsoft was saying: "Windows was set in stone in Windows 95 - it had all the needed feature like windows and stuff"
Try TCP/IP rather. It would be stupid if memo would say that. Than you can compare it to windows 95.
if you don't trust him completely, it's better get get out now imo
>As if miners wont run an implementation aside from ABC.
Jfc..
ahh, so you seem to be expecting more splits & fracturing for BCH 💔
Last time I'll respond to you.
Amaury doesn't matter.
